A small boy, on his knees, hangs over the bath with his nanny, a Romanesque beauty he calls Ninny. Her dark eyes smile at him. In the bath bromide papers float; photographs taken with her Kodak 3A. A refulgent privacy would characterise Cecil’s own photography: upturned faces, steamy lighting, flowery auras. A vicious bitch, he was nonetheless given to lingering adorations. Ninny, for one, went on to assist Cecil when he, in a studio screened by magenta silk and pale muslin, created his own world of made-up characters, assisted by a cast of real queens, kings, writers and actors.
This world-making, making the private public, is showcased in the exhibition, Cecil Beaton’s Bright Young Things at The National Portrait Gallery, London, 12 March to 7 June 2020. Beaton, crafting his own story in over 120 volumes of diaries that he edited and redrafted, was a forerunner of Instagram. Through his own filter of myth-making, he photographed his hawkish eyes and sullen, rouged pout and sent his selfies to Social Editors, determined to be a celebrity. “No one could help me,” he said, in a 1962 BBC interview. “It was up to me to find the sort of world I wanted.”
Born in 1904, Cecil was not poor, despite casting himself as a Cinderella. However, as the oldest son of a timber merchant and grandson of a Cumberland blacksmith, Beaton was deprived of that aristocratic spectacle, typical of Elizabethan dandies, or Beau Brummel, that might have otherwise sanctioned his femininity. Embarrassed by his bourgeois Hampstead home, Beaton had no intention of overthrowing the Establishment. He plotted to better it. He petitioned Vogue and Tatler with portraits of himself, his mother and his sisters. He wore drag for the Footlights at Cambridge and failed to get a degree. Dressing himself as an upper-class socialite, he invented his own form of queer prestige, borrowing from Surrealism, aestheticism and the theatre.
Surrealism allowed personality to be everything and nothing, as Beaton demonstrated when he savagely and dazzlingly photographed three of the arty Sitwell siblings as a vertical row of heads appearing out of a mirror. The Sitwells the in-crowd of fashionable London society. Following Cambridge, they’d taken up Beaton, who was also befriended by Stephan Tennant, the openly gay lover of the poet Siegfreid Sassoon. Tennant hosted the group nicknamed The Bright Young Things at his family home at Wilsford Manor. It was to Beaton’s social advantage to suggest, through Surrealism, that anyone, mainly Beaton, could emerge from anywhere. He beheaded privileged kids and turned their heads into ornamental knobs. But egalitarianism wasn’t his thing. Beaton’s androgynous fantasies had to be supported by a cast of toffs. Whereas Tennant flaunted his homosexuality, notoriously arriving in New York with an armful of lillies and wittily subverting the custom’s guard’s homophobia into a bon mot, Beaton’s bisexuality was less flamboyant. He was rejected by the man and the woman he loved – art collector Peter Watson and Greta Garbo. When we view his shrine-like portraits and tableaux against Beaton’s own feeling he was a “felon and an outcast” we might better understand their haughty Aryan gleam.
Maxine Freeman- Thomas dressed for Ascot in the year 2000 for the Dream of Fair Women Ball by Cecil Beaton, 1928.
An Oscar-winning costume designer, also excelling in theatre design, Beaton used artifice to defy a British masculinity that precluded him. Far from concealing technique, his pictures flaunt the artifice required to produce a detailed Englishness, fantastical and Imperialist. Beaton’s Tory Romanticism is closer to the spirit of Disraeli, Churchill and Mountbatten than Oscar Wilde or the French decadents.
In The Bright Young Things At Wilsford (1927), Beaton can be seen on the far right. He pose is balletic, a little apart from the rest – and a little more pantomime dame (he played Cinderella’s ugly step-sister, at one of the Wilsford parties, in a splitting of himself). The costumed group appear unreal, superimposed on the old country house, as they do in their famous photograph on the bridge at Wilsford. The camera is intoxicated, almost savage in its slant. Beaton’s slants and simmerings separate his world from ours – yet require the bewilderment of the viewer for their effect.
Throughout his early career, Beaton used his sisters, debutantes Baba and Nancy Beaton as feminine mirrors of his own hawk-eyed, blonde beauty.
Here, in ‘Nancy and Baba Beaton, 1926’, a mirror splits Beaton’s vision of female Narcissus. Reflected statuary and the sunlight breaking through a roughly draped window hint at a classical yet domestic world. This feminine space of self-making is rapturous yet sterile. Baba’s movie star head hovers, decapitated, above her elder sister, Nancy. Cecil liked beheadings. The mirror guillotines Nancy’s neck as she looks up from a rumpled silk sheet, at this dream of a woman, her double, except younger, better. Baba, self-absorbed, does not meet Nancy’s look. Beaton would return several times to self-absorbed floating heads. Personality seems like an inevitable fact. Many of Beaton’s more polished portraits of Baba shine loftily with mirrors and silver thunderclouds. But here is the violence, loneliness and fragmentation behind the feminine construction.
Sexuality, in Beaton’s photographs, is suspended. A repeated ruse by which he elevated and sublimated the feminine body was to fix the sitter in a sequinned dresses against sequinned background. When costume obscures, any visible soft flesh looks alluring. But with her hair capped in fishy sequins, the metallic eyeshadow, profiled face and clasped hands of Paula Gellibrand, Marquesa de Casa Maury (1928) is overwhelming and sexless as the sea. Exotic costumes, sets and poses dominate the human. Indeed, one of the most riveting photographs in this exhibition is a campy funeral presentation, ‘Edith Sitwell At Sussex Gardens (1926)’, in which the theatrical corpse of Sitwell, is laid with white death lilies (another recurring motif) and wrapped in a futuristic shroud, flanked by stone putti. This is sexlessness for entertainment, ambitious and isolated.
Men did not fare better (or worse, depending on whether you prefer aestheticism to realism). Oliver Messel, in his ostrich feather plumed helmet and white embroidered tunic, poses as Paris in Oh Helen! He is profiled as a Grecian object, a silhouette on an antique vase brought to life by a flood of lighting. Messel’s youth – or is it Vaseline – congeals on his gleaming cheekbone. His beauty coldly overturns Helen’s claim of world-destroying desirability. He is a neutered hunk, battered by white glamour, bent beneath feathers and diaphanous drapery.
Beaton’s father’s fertile body made him squeamish. He compared Daddy’s attempts at photography to a child tugging at the umbilical cord. He was disconnected from his father’s cigar-chomping masculinity – “that sort of laughter in the billiard room was a world … I had a slight antipathy to” – and from his brother, whom he felt his father preferred and who committed suicide. Obsessed by perfect pairings, Beaton appears here as a blonde twin to Stephan Tennant in their diagonally slanted portrait, by Maurice Beck and Helen Macgregor, 1927.
In marcel waves and screen goddess profile, Tennant poses on Beaton’s shoulder, the two of them in pastiche sporty stripes. Beaton’s finely manicured hands are clasped again in a dance pose, satirising the naval hornpipe. The upset mirror this time suggests the upheaval of masculine forces, much like Andy Warhol’s later photographing of the Dupont twins. But the sensual, freckled, manly ripple of those later twins is here flattened to a jagged sternness.
One feels the pressure of the gender roles navigated by Beaton. In his diaries, carnality nauseates him. Elizabeth Taylor is a “thick great revolving mass of femininity at its rawest.” Bullied by Katherine Hepburn over his costume designs, he scrutinises her: “a raddled, rash ridden, freckled, burnt, mottled, bleached and wizened piece of decaying matter”. In his photograph of another pair of visual twins, his friends, the Jungman sisters, Beaton lays them naked on cellophane suggestive of a mortuary sheet. “The Jungman sisters are a pair of decadent 18th-century angels made of wax,” Beaton wrote, “exhibited at Madame Tussaud’s before the fire.”
By the 1930s, Beaton was a celebrated photographer for Vogue and the British royal family. His photographs staged their comeback after Edward VIII’s abdication. He seemed unstoppable in his conglomerations of artificial effects. In his work from this time, backgrounds of silver foil radiate an asphyxiated glamour. Living flesh is embalmed to perfection. He arranges women like cornucopia.
Beaton returns to Ninny’s bathroom, in a way, with The Silver Soapsuds (1930). Here, in another diagonal composition, Baba Beaton, the Hon. Mrs Charles Baillie-Hamilton and Lady Bridget Poulett pour out of an apparently torn backdrop, an irradiated silvery halo. They appear adrift on cellophane wrapped bubbles, in, unusually, for Beaton, a suggestive bloom of sturdy frivolity. Their fashionably rounded bare shoulders and sloping décolletages are revealed by identical silver sequin gowns. Unlike his more austere divas, the silken hair of this trio bobs beyond their silver caps. They are a Jazz Age girl group, anthers of femininity buoyed by the gelatinated ovaries of an organism greater than themselves: Beaton himself.
Faced by WWII, Beaton chose realism over fantasy. In 1938, he’d been sacked by Vogue for submitting a caricature of ‘New York Society’ which included the phrase, ‘damned kikes’ as in the print on fluttering newspapers surrounding a burst of trombones, telephones, party girls and swizzle sticks.
He denied anti-Semitism and blamed exhaustion for this “subconscious” slip. He felt himself vindicated when he was hired by the UK Ministry of Information as a war photojournalist. It was in this period that he took his famous picture of a Polish Jewish refugee boy in Palestine (1942). “I was sick to death,” he said, “Of photographing people around apple blossom.”
The maturing Beaton nonetheless pursued a fantasy of making his own Bright Wiltshire kingdom, married, as he hoped, to Greta Garbo. Garbo’s aquiline profile, downturned mouth and morose-divine gaze made her Beaton’s ideal twin (“as beautiful as the aurora borealis” he wrote). For 14 years, Beaton courted from afar this “half-boy, half-woman”, till in 1946 she suddenly instigated sex in the Plaza hotel. Following walks in Central Park and afternoons in bed, Beaton proposed. He bought Reddish, a Queen Anne house in Wiltshire, for them. She visited, “fooling around” she said. When he said he wanted a child by her, Garbo remarked, cruelly but fittingly, that she would have it beheaded.
Beaton’s Cinderella fantasies funnelled into the films Gigi and My Fair Lady, winning 3 Oscars for costume and art design.
Alan Jay Lerner, working with him on My Fair Lady, noted, “Inside Cecil there is a another Cecil Beaton sending out lots of little Cecils into the world”. In a portrait here by Paul Tanqueray, Beaton, smattered with his selfies, stares down the camera. He sits, or rather, rides, a stool. Skinny, nervy, he looks prematurely exhausted by his own condescension. This exhibition presents Beaton’s project to reproduce a new Cecil, artificial, asexual and, beneath the silvery surface, trapped between his pursuit of subversion and prestige.
All photographs courtesy of The National Portrait Gallery and the exhibition, Cecil Beaton’s Bright Young Things, at The National Portrait Gallery, London, 12 March to 7 June 2020.
By Soma Ghosh